Ten years ago, I was exploring the possible origin of human culture in tribal societies driven by rhythmic dance and music. Tribal societies are on rare occasions characterized by paternal anonymity, or children who are unaware of the identity of their biological father. Observing that human brain size began to diminish about 25,000 years ago, I hypothesized that this reflected an emerging patrifocal emphasis on speech instead of gesture and a movement away from a selection for big-brained males. If this was the case, I suspected that there might be remnants of the old matrifocal paradigm that still exist within contemporary society. In the neurological literature, I sought humans with unusually large brains, difficulty with language, but who were also ambidextrous or left-handed. I came to find that autistic individuals commonly display these features; in addition, I discovered that individuals with autism are often obsessed with pattern replication and have perfect pitch (Brenton, Devries, Barton, Minnich & Sokol, 2008).

It appeared that hidden beneath the just-so story was a theory, which, if brought to light, could help make useful predictions and illuminate unrecognized relationships. From the beginning, the theory drew information from three different disciplines: anthropology, evolutionary biology and neuropsychology; yet, because these three disciplines did not share a common language, it became my goal to show that they were indeed studying an identical process. Evolutionary biology’s heterochronic theory explored the long-term effects of changing maturation rates, while anthropological explorations of human social structure examined the repercussions that one or more generation’s mate choice has on society. Researchers in the field of neuropsychology largely neglected to acknowledge the evolutionary implications of their discoveries, which could elucidate the parallels between the environment’s influence on uterine hormone levels and the distribution of handedness across a society. It became clear to me that all three subdisciplines were describing the dynamic of sexual selection and how sexual selection’s influence on maturation rates impacts human evolution. There seemed limited opportunities for the practitioners of each discipline to feel moved by potential synergies with their academic neighbors. However, in order to further understand human evolution, there seems a need to speak the basic languages of these three subdisciplines.

This work seeks to transcend the academic language barrier by emphasizing common patterns and ideas shared by all three subdisciplines.

This introduction to the Theory of Waves begins with an overview of four hypothetical, yet fundamental, social structures (two matrifocal and two patrifocal) and outlines the hormonal constellation of the individuals who comprise those four basic prototypes. There exists an elegant dynamic that compels and maintains these four balances. This dynamic, as explained below, can be maintained or propelled at three different levels of two overlapping hormonal paradigms.

Below, I discuss the impact this dynamic has on understanding ethnic variation, disease and condition etiology. For example, I reframe female infanticide as a socially engineered form of sexual selection. The hormonal constellations that arise as a result of this selection process produce a low prevalence of female breast cancer in Asian societies.

Having investigated related theories, I offer several reasons why neuropsychological studies have produced such inconsistent results. This theory, the Theory of Waves, ends by making a number of predictions that concentrate on autism. These predictions provide an opportunity for members of the academic community to prove this story wrong. It has been by matching up anomalies across disciplines and by discovering melodies using the black keys on a piano that this theory has come together.

I believe that understanding neoteny (the prolongation of ancestor infant features into the adults of descendants) is integral to understanding the process of becoming human. Central to understanding neoteny is understanding early play behavior. Experiencing this theory as it has come together over the last ten years has felt like deep play, frequently crossing the line to the reverential. Let the following concepts play across your mind like music. Email me if this theory strikes a chord with your own experiences, or if it harmonizes with your own understanding.

In this model, or theory, which I’ve been calling the Theory of Waves, there are eight varieties of humans, four male and four female. These eight types of humans feature specific characteristics, or tendencies. Each type of human can be influenced by other types, and each is susceptible to specific features in the environment. Environmental influences can compel the progeny of these types of humans to transform into other types of humans. These environmental influences compel evolutionary currents, which can provoke a significant transformation within a single generation. More often, however, these transformations occur over the course of centuries or longer.

Similar to Watson and Crick’s double helix, a larger body is created from an assembly of component parts. In this case, societies are made up of eight types of human beings, each of whom represents one of the eight potential combinations derived from the hormonal extremes. The hormonal extremes form a structure that serves as a template for a majority of the individuals within a society. The majority of individuals within a society will exhibit some basic features associated with these hormonal extremes, yet they will exhibit these extremes to less of a degree than the eight prototype humans.

Imagine that the eight basic artist colors (purple, red, blue, yellow, orange, green, black and white) are all being blended in specific ways to paint the character of a society. Or, consider that instead of the two planets Mars and Venus, which represent the classic male/female dichotomy, there are eight planets—four female and four male—which together comprise a pantheon of eight gods and goddesses.

Female Constellations
High testosterone, high estrogen (F TE)
High testosterone, low estrogen (F Te)
Low testosterone, high estrogen (F tE)
Low testosterone, low estrogen (F te)

Male Constellations
High testosterone, high estrogen (M TE)
High testosterone, low estrogen (M Te)
Low testosterone, high estrogen (M tE)
Low testosterone, low estrogen (M te)

As in the double helix, there are natural complementary pairings. In this framework, opposite sexes are not only drawn to each other based on sexual attraction, but they are also drawn to each other based on the attraction to their complementary opposite hormonal counterparts.

Female te/Male TE
Female tE/Male Te
Female Te/Male tE
Female TE/Male te

The complementary counterparts naturally ally themselves into patrifocal and matrifocal social structures. There exist two variations within each.

F te/M TE Conventional Patrifocal
F tE/M Te Warrior Patrifocal
F Te/M tE Contemporary Matrifocal
F TE/M te Classic Matrifocal

Conventional Patrifocal: Domineering, caring and discriminating men who choose cooperative women.

Warrior Patrifocal: Domineering men who choose cooperative, caring and discriminating women.

Contemporary Matrifocal: Commanding women who choose creative, cooperative, caring and discriminating men.

Classic Matrifocal: Commanding, caring and discriminating women who choose creative and cooperative men.

These fundamental paradigms are flexile and have an ability to transform from one societal prototype into another over time. The human hormone thresholds can vary over time and can control the speed and direction of evolution. The thresholds can be influenced at three locations within two interlocking cycles, or feedback loops, as described below.

Mother’s testosterone level > progeny maturation rate > social structure proclivity > mother’s testosterone level.

Mother’s estrogen level > progeny ability to exercise aesthetic discrimination and caring behavior > social structure proclivity > mother’s estrogen level.

The environment can intervene at any of the three levels of these two loops by influencing both maturation rates and timing (via testosterone) or by influencing the intensity of mate selection criteria (via estrogen).

Level 1: A mother’s uterine hormonal levels are impacted by environmental influences, which in turn affect the child’s maturation and development. The hormonal levels of the mother influence the overall disposition of the social structure by predisposing certain tendencies of the progeny.
Level 2: The environment, through a variety of specific hormone-influencing prompts, impacts a person in society, thereby shifting social structure proclivities.
Level 3: Shifts in social structure influence mate selection criteria, which alter evolutionary trajectories.

Changes may occur at the level of the womb, individual ontogeny and/or at the level of society. The relationship among these three environmentally susceptible locations creates an interactive system, which directs evolutionary trajectory.

Central to this model are the environmental impact points, which compel the transformation of a society and our species. In a woman’s womb, testosterone levels decide her children’s testosterone levels (Geschwind & Galaburda, 1987) and their maturation rates and social structure proclivity. Females (F) with high testosterone (T) give birth to high-testosterone (T) females and low-testosterone (t) males. F T = F T or M t. The reverse is true for low-testosterone females. Low-testosterone females give birth to low-testosterone females and high-testosterone males. F t = F t or M T. This is how societal prototypes are created and maintained and how the complementary opposite foundation of this thesis emerges.

This may be feeling rather dense. Bear with me. I will define some terms.

“Neoteny” refers to the prolonging of infant features over many generations so that eventually they appear in the adults of the descendants. For example, chimpanzee-like progenitor features, such as having a large head relative to body size, small chin, large eyes, upward stature, curiosity and affection, are all characteristics that over time manifest in the physiology and psychology of adults. Acceleration reverses the evolutionary trajectory, whereby processes featured by ancestor adults condense or withdraw over time and appear earlier in development in the characteristics of children as well as in the infants of future descendants.

Heterochronic dynamics (Gould, 1977) of evolution (i.e., neoteny and acceleration) are embedded in social structure and lead to the very specific mating of neotenous males with accelerated females in matrifocal social structures and accelerated males marrying neotenous females in patrifocal social structures. There is a direct connection between womb conditions, maturation rate directions (neoteny and acceleration) and social structure.

The net result is that not only are males and females mating with their hormonal complementary opposites, but also that societies are evolving with males and females trending evolutionarily in opposite directions by continuing selection for opposite proclivities in opposite sexes. It is conceivable that in human beings there exists a dynamic that demands eventual flipping of social structures, perhaps over periods as long as hundreds of thousands of years or as short as 6,000 years (Gimbutas, 1991). This provides an opportunity for the sexes to realign. It is also possible that this “flipping” is constantly occurring within different lineages in a society, which are taking turns performing the role of the hormonal outliers, or eight prototype humans.

Whereas the influence of a mother’s testosterone levels on her progeny has been established (Geschwind & Galaburda, 1987), this model hypothesizes that the mother’s estrogen levels influence her children via an identical dynamic, which encourages and reinforces the sexually selected focus on partner choice and discrimination, as well as caring and care giving. In this case, the estrogen levels within a woman’s womb determine her children’s estrogen levels, their tendencies toward evaluation of nuance and their compulsion to care. A female (F) with high estrogen (E) gives birth to high-estrogen females and low-estrogen (e) males. F E = F E or M e. The reverse is true for low-estrogen females. F e = F e or M E. This is how estrogen-related societal prototypes are created and maintained. This dynamic also contributes to the complementary opposite foundation of this thesis.

Whether a male or female has high or low estrogen levels does not contribute to maturation rates. This makes it possible to have high or low-estrogen males and females in any social structure. Maturation rates inform heterochronic tendencies and social structure proclivities. Nevertheless, estrogen confers discrimination, an attention to detail that can exaggerate the proclivity of a social structure. In addition, estrogen focuses on the features of a child, attracting those with high estrogen toward individuals who exhibit childlike features. Assign high estrogen to a female with high testosterone and you achieve Classic Matrifocal social structure with commanding females prone to choosing cooperative males with neotenous, or child-like, characteristics. Assign high estrogen to a male and you get either a Scandinavian Contemporary Matrifocal paradigm (Eisler, 2007) with both sexes exhibiting neoteny in a matrifocal context, or you get an Asian Conventional Patrifocal paradigm with males who are focused on mating with females displaying highly neotenous features. When pairing high estrogen with high testosterone, you get an exaggerated intensity of sexual selection, not unlike Fisher’s runaway sexual selection (Fisher, 1930), which results in a powerful focus on neoteny. F TE = Matrifocal selection for neotenous males. M TE = Patrifocal selection for neotenous females.

The particular way that testosterone and estrogen align with individuals within a society compels both social structure and particular physical features of individuals. These two hormones, which influence heterochronic trajectories, also influence personality features, disease and condition proclivities, societal characteristics and even such societal mysteries as female infanticide.

Another way to view this is by noting that at the extremes, a society displays the highest and lowest hormonal thresholds. These thresholds exist in those with bodies and minds most impacted by the battle between somatic function and behaviors, which are both required for survival. Those at the hormonal extremes are at the front lines of what a body can easily survive. When the environment changes, the extremes are put under more intense distress as the societal balanced polymorphism (the established balance of social structures within a society) is pushed in a specific direction. The majority of society, which exists in the center of this spectrum and which also has a heterozygote advantage (Annett, 2002), are compelled to drift left or right, matrifocal or patrifocal, over the course of several generations. Those at the margins are under the most intense duress.

Even in a society characterized by one of the four foundation social structures, one or more of the other social structures are integrally involved. Assimilated within a society are representative individuals, couples and subcultures, who act as social structure opposites to the established paradigm. In this way, these couples and subcultures also contribute to the balanced polymorphism. Though we in the West have been living in patrifocal social structures, matrifocal elements are integrated within the larger society and occupy the “left” end of the spectrum. American society displays a combination of all four social structures. Together, all four of these form a balance that is changing, particularly now.

There are a number of repercussions, or implications, of this basic model, and details are explored below. The etiologies for a number of physical and mental diseases and conditions are suggested by understanding the eight human prototypes as hormonal outliers that exist on a continuum within social structures and are held in balance so that they create a heterozygote advantage. Those whose hormonal constellations exist at the center are not burdened by hormonal extremes. The engine behind human evolution can be examined in detail so that one may offer a number of predictions. This work will concentrate on conditions characterized by maturational delay and acceleration, and it will focus particularly on autism. The reader will be able to infer by this example how the principles in this Theory of Waves can be applied to a number of diseases and conditions.

Neuroscientists will recognize at the core of this thesis a variation of the Geschwind and Galaburda (1987) hypothesis that connects hormones, handedness, lateralization and debilitations. Evolutionary developmental biologists familiar with nineteenth century principles of heterochrony (the study of the effects of changing maturation and development rates and timing) will find heterochronic processes (Gould, 1977) manifesting in neuropsychological studies of the endocrine system (specifically, testosterone and estrogen). These evolutionary biologists will also recognize how sexual hormones influence maturation rates and timing (Hall, Person & Muller, 2004). Anthropologists will be able to observe the impact of social structure—and the forms of sexual selection that drive social structure (such as female sexual selection and female infanticide)—on how societies transform and our species evolves. Studies of human social structures are integrally tied to both the evolutionary biological principle of heterochrony and neuropsychological processes driven by testosterone and estrogen.

For example, I’m hypothesizing that in highly patrifocal hierarchical Asian societies, originally organized in ways that demanded large-scale cooperation in order to manage irrigation works spanning for hundreds of miles, males need to be high in testosterone relative to females, while simultaneously being low testosterone relative to other males. This would be necessary in order to better facilitate cooperation within a highly combative hierarchical and patrifocal society requiring male/male collaboration. In this hypothesis, I shift down both estrogen and testosterone levels to accommodate lower testosterone levels for males in a patrifocal society with cooperative undertones. A relatively high-estrogen Asian male is suggested by the highly aesthetic and visually discriminating Asian culture. Relatively low female estrogen level is implied by ubiquitous female infanticide. To fit this model, Asian females would have to exhibit the lowest recorded female estrogen levels. This would mean the normally low Conventional Patrifocal female estrogen would have to be shifted lower in order to accommodate Asian male patrifocal cooperation. And, indeed, studies support anomalously low female Asian estrogen levels (Diamond, 1986).

Female infanticide may be integrated into an understanding of patrifocal social structure—particularly the Conventional Patrifocal social structure of hierarchical Asian social structures, which exhibit long-term stability. When the number of females in the procreation pool is reduced, far fewer males are able to have children. A heavy emphasis is placed on the ideal male, the non-ideal males procreating far less. The result is a continuing selection of highly patrifocal traits in the male population. Because of this, left spectrum and older genotype features that accompany matrifocal social structure do not easily emerge. This would include left-handedness, an attraction to innovation and spontaneous creativity. Instead, status, hierarchy and tradition would be highly valued, as is the case with traditional Asian culture. Female infanticide is a powerful sexual selection tool providing long-term stability to Conventional Patrifocal societies. Very low incidence of autism would also be expected, as I will explain shortly.

With individuals congregating around the eight hormonal paradigms, we’d expect that many diseases, disorders and conditions would be assigned to those located at the extremes, or outlying positions of the balanced polymorphism. For example, Asian females with very low estrogen should have low rates of breast cancer, while matrifocal societies with high estrogen should exhibit high rates of breast cancer. One would expect the same pattern with prostate cancer. We’d expect to see relatively few cases of prostate cancer in Asian patrifocal societies but high rates of prostate cancer in patrifocal societies that exhibit little cooperation. In Contemporary Matrifocal Scandinavia, one would expect very low rates of prostate cancer, yet relatively high rates of male breast cancer. Social structures compel hormonal tendencies, suggesting disease and condition etiology.

For conditions like autism, Asperger’s, stuttering and phonetic dyslexia, we’d expect to see the four matrifocal categories trending toward these conditions, with a possible emphasis on M te and F TE if Classic Matrifocal is how we primarily evolved (see below). Autism, Asperger’s, stuttering and phonetic dyslexia are often accompanied by male maturational delay, which is a marker of matrifocal societies. Matrifocal societies feature low-testosterone males and high-testosterone females.

There is the possibility that certain mental conditions will trend toward these same hormonal extremes. I would estimate that borderline personality disorder, narcissistic personality disorder and obsessive compulsive disorder, based upon their association with families exhibiting left-handers and maturational delay, will fit the same matrifocal profiles, again with a likely Classic Matrifocal emphasis.

Diseases and conditions may have multiple etiologies depending on the particular symptoms they are associated with. For example, Marian Annett and colleagues noted two types of dyslexia. She observed phonetic dyslexia trending toward the extreme left end of the balanced polymorphism and visual dyslexia trending toward the extreme right (Annett, Eglinton & Smythe, 1996).

Schizophrenia may display two radically different etiologies, which would appear in both patrifocal and matrifocal cultures. These two different etiologies would be based upon the hypothesis that hemispheric differentiation and corpus callosum size vary according to two extremes (Coger & Serafetinides, 1990). One etiology is reinforced by facility with language (Crow, 1995; Crow, Done & Sacker, 1996) and is accompanied by a surge in patrifocal social structures, while the other displays a familial and social structure identical to the familial and social structure of autism, characterized by matrifocal origins.

I am hypothesizing a five-step evolutionary continuum that begins with natural selection but then moves to sexual selection. In this continuum, animals focus on particular patterns when they choose a mate. Step three begins with crossing a bridge over to human sexual selection, where adept practitioners of novel pattern creation are selected as procreation partners by mates with sensitivity to these nuances (Miller, 2000). The fourth step is taken when novelty itself becomes desirable outside the partner selection process, and society is thus compelled to embrace in its productions countless nuances of the new. In the fifth stage, awareness of the creation process itself becomes a target experience.

1) natural selection
2) sexual selection (selecting for pattern when seeking a mate)
3) human sexual selection (selection for novel pattern when seeking a mate)
4) art and culture (selecting for novel pattern outside of mate selection)
5) awareness of the selection or creative process

Integrated into the sequence established above is the longer-term dynamic of humans, who evolved from random-handed non-speech users (Annett, 2002) with two equally large cerebral hemispheres and a wide corpus callosum (Witelson, 1991).

I hypothesize that step 3 of this sequence is compelled by long-term male maturational delay and reinforced by sexual selection in a matrifocal context, where child-like features attract more focus (Gould, 1977). Classic Matrifocal was likely our social structure at this stage (Knight, 1991). Stage 4 suggests a shift toward patrifocal social structure as well as a decrease in brain size (Wiercinski, 1979), culminating in the Warrior Patrifocal. This sequence suggests that Classic Matrifocal and Warrior Matrifocal preceded Contemporary Matrifocal as well as Conventional Patrifocal, with the possible emergence of Contemporary and Conventional in the last 5,000 years.

Deep societal change can occur quickly when there is a change in hormonal constellations. Sudden shifts can occur from matrifocal to patrifocal, or patrifocal to matrifocal. For example, if a matrifocal society is highly stressed over time by patrifocal incursions, the ideal male mate may shift from one displaying cooperative tendencies to a male who is quick to fight. Formerly highly valued aesthetic-oriented males may then find themselves outside the pool of highly valued potential mates. In mere generations, physiological, hormonal and neuropsychological transformations can occur.

Migrating populations exposed to changes in sunlight (Geschwind and Galburda, 1987) show radical fluctuations in social structure, which impacts evolution over time. Sunlight impacts the pineal gland, which directly influences the testosterone levels within the individuals of a population (Geschwind and Galburda, 1987). A variety of specific diseases and conditions acquired by the eight prototype hormonal outliers will emerge among these migrating peoples, including autism. In addition, changing diet can exaggerate hormonal changes.

A radical change in diet, such as an increase in high quality fats and nutrients, could raise a female’s estrogen and testosterone levels and lower a male’s testosterone levels (Ahluwalia, Jackson, Jones, Williams, Mamidanna & Rajguru, 1981). These changes in hormonal levels would compel a shift in social structure toward the direction of female choice. Females would then seek mates that were cooperators rather than warriors. Sudden dietary changes that drastically reduce access to high fat foods could compel a hormonal shift toward a patrifocal social structure. These hormonal shifts would be further accentuated if combative situations emerged. This is the variation of the Kuzawa (2007) thesis, which proposes that uterine environments can influence adult physiology. My Theory of Waves thesis suggests that the parent’s hormonal shifts can adjust a progeny’s hormonal constellations and shift a society’s hormonal spectrum in a particular direction, depending on environmental pressures. Such hormonal shifts thus result in modifications of social structure.

Eight environmental variables influence testosterone, including light (Geschwind & Galaburda, 1987), diet (Schmidt, Wijga, Von Zur Muhlen, Brabant & Wagner, 1997), body fat (Ross, Bernstein, Judd, Hanisch, Pike & Henderson, 1986; Glass, Swerdloff, Bray, Dahms & Atkinson, 1977), alcohol and drugs (Castilla-Garcia, Santolaria-Fernandez, Gonzalez-Reimers, Bastita-Lopez, Gonzalez-Garcia, Jorge-Hernandez & Hernandez-Nieto, 1987; Ahluwalia, Clark, Westney, Smith, James, & Rajguru, 1992), tobacco (MacMahon, Trichopoulos, Cole & Brown, 1982; Barrett-Connor & Khaw, 1987), touch, physical activity (MacConnie, Barkan, Lampman, Schork, & Beitins, 1986; Morville, Pesquies, Guezennec, Serrurier & Guignard, 1979) and stress (James, 1986). Estrogen has been far less studied, but diet has been repeatedly shown to dramatically influence estrogen levels (Ahluwalia, et al., 1981).

We can view evolution as both a dynamic and static process that is driven by social structure, environmental influences, maturation rate modifications and hormonal changes. The evolutionary developmental biological view, or the heterochronic perspective, offers a dynamic frame. Annett’s (2002) modern UK society is characterized by a balanced polymorphism, which exhibits an evenly balanced static spectrum view of left and right-handed individuals. On the far left side of this spectrum exist the extreme left-handed, as well as the random-handed, and on the far right side of this spectrum exist the extreme right-handed. Most people in a society exist somewhere in the middle. This spectrum of individuals is aligned along a gradated curve and offers a static snapshot of our society in the process of transition. The older anomalously dominant (both cerebral hemispheres close to the same size) matrifocal prototype is stationed at the left side and balances those with cerebral asymmetry designed for speech facility, the patrifocal prototype, on the right. Annett’s Right Shift Theory (Annett, 1985) argues that cerebral asymmetry with language proclivity offers a heterozygote advantage that allows the moderate right-handed to occupy the center of society. This Theory of Waves integrates social structure, maturation rates and a long-term evolutionary arc into Annett’s static snapshot in time.

Four major barriers prevent the easy appraisal of the natural hormonal levels that characterize the eight human prototypes.

Assays that fail to measure the variations of handedness with the degree of sensitivity established by Annett’s peg tests obstruct new insight and obscure potentially valuable observation. Annett’s work concluded that humans evolved as a random-handed species, which transitioned to right-handed when brains became lateralized for speech. Her peg tests measure degrees of right and random-handedness and are integral for establishing a locus related to social structure, disease/condition proclivity and maturation rate propensity. It is essential that different studies, particularly studies across cultures, compare apples to apples and use Annett’s protocols when measuring handedness.

It would be useful if Annett’s techniques were required to measure handedness around the world, quickly. Dietary changes within patrifocal societies may be skewing results dramatically. Aboriginal societies with a matrifocal foundation have almost completely disappeared. There are very few tools available to measure variations in societal balanced polymorphisms. Annett’s peg tests seem to measure the effects of testosterone and some indirect effects of estrogen fairly well.

The eight environmental variables noted above profoundly impact the hormone levels of males and females in a variety of contexts. To effectively measure the natural hormonal thresholds in ontogeny at any point, one must have an understanding of how that person’s hormonal levels are being influenced and altered by external variables. Adult hormone levels are dramatically impacted by a variety of factors. Existing studies show wild variation in results because these studies ignore influential variables. One study that measured testosterone levels neglected to take into consideration the time of day that levels were tested. In addition, the effects of stress cannot be underestimated. For example, measuring the testosterone levels of an autistic child in an institutional setting does little to provide an idea of that child’s base hormonal threshold, particularly if that child is on a standard institutional diet. Diet has been shown to have an effect on the symptoms of autism (Hjiej, Doyen, Couprie, Kaye & Contejean, 2008).

Some diseases and conditions appear at both ends of the left/right spectrum and occupy multiple poles of both matrifocal and patrifocal social structure. Annett approached dyslexia etiologies from a new perspective and established a protocol, which discovered that handedness congregated at both the extreme left and right ends of the spectrum. Diseases and conditions with more than one etiology often confound studies and frustrate attempts to discover patterns in social structure, handedness, hormonal constellations and ethnicity. It may seem that a disease such as schizophrenia, or a condition such as obsessive-compulsive disorder, does not always associate with a specific social structure or prototype predilection when more than one etiology is potentially in play.

Lastly, the season in which an individual is born affects the maturational delay and acceleration of that individual. Season of birth can thus help polarize a society’s social structure to either end of the spectrum. The effects of pineal-influenced testosterone levels may not merely be influencing those who live in migrating populations but also those who live in relative climatic extremes. When individuals within a society congregate at the hormonal extremes, vacating the balanced polymorphistic middle where those with the heterozygote advantage reside, it becomes nearly impossible to form conclusions about a society normally based on a seamless arc, or balance. In other words, climate and migration patterns influence the variables we’ve been noting.

These four conditions that inhibit high quality information regarding hormone levels—inconsistent handedness studies, untracked environmental variables, multiple pole disease/condition etiologies and season of birth effects—are primary reasons that the Geschwind/Galaburda hypothesis drew mixed support.

Norman Geschwind and his colleagues suggested that a number of diseases and conditions tend to align with specific handedness and cerebral lateralization tendencies. Geschwind believed that the random-handed (often left-handers) and the anomalously dominant, both of whom exhibit cerebral hemispheres near the same size, were evolutionary derivations. I agree with Annett (2002) that the random-handed and anomalously dominant are our evolutionary forebears, but I’ve added that these ancestral genotypes are matrifocal in origin.

Approaching Geschwind and Galaburda’s (1987) thesis with a heterochronic/social structure perspective gives one the ability to hypothesize the etiologies of a host of diseases and conditions as well as suggest a relationship between handedness, hormonal associations, social structure, lateralization, ethnicity and environmental variables.

These are some of the diseases and conditions noted in the literature (mostly from Geschwind and Galaburda, 1987) that offer correlations with some of the variables addressed in this model: alcoholism, Alzheimer’s disease, anxiety, asthma, ataxia telangiectasia, atopic syndrome, attention deficit disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, benign intracranial hypertension, bi-polar disorder, borderline personality disorder, breast cancer, congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), cluster headaches, celiac disease, conduct disorder, congenital heart disease, dementia, depression, diabetes, Down’s syndrome, dyslexia, dystrophia myotonica, endometriosis, epilepsy, gastrointestinal issues, harelip, heart disease, Huntington’s disease, immune disorders, hyperkinetic syndrome, Kartagener syndrome, Klinefelter syndrome, Klippel-Feil syndrome, lupus erythematosus, migraine headaches, mital valve prolapse, narcissistic personality disorder, obesity, obsessive compulsive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, osteoporosis, ovarian cysts, Parkinson’s disease, phobias, pilonidal sinus, polycystic ovary syndrome, prostate cancer, schizophrenia, scoliosis, spina bifida, stuttering, temporal lobe epilepsy, thyroid disorders, torticollis, Tourette’s syndrome, Turner syndrome and twinning. Cross reference these variables with handedness, social structure, maturation rates, ethnicity, family of origin, cerebral dominance and hormonal levels. All of these conditions offer opportunities to observe the relationships of these conditions and diseases to the eight human prototypes.

The predictions below focus specifically on issues of relative maturation rates with an emphasis on autism and related conditions.

1) Autistic males, from families of left-handers, will have lower testosterone than the norm, and autistic females will have higher testosterone. The mothers will have high testosterone (Baron-Cohen, Lutchmaya & Knickmeyer, 2004) and quite possibly high estrogen. If we evolved primarily from high F TE, M te, then autistic males will have low estrogen, and autistic females will have high estrogen. (In any study of autism, those with familial male maturation delay tendencies, or families of left-handers, need to be evaluated separately from those possibly traumatized by an environmental effect.)

2) Larger penis and testicle size will be associated with autistic, ambidextrous males and the familial left-handed. Left-handed males and autistics will produce more sperm. (This is based on the large testicle matrifocal bonobo sexual egalitarian paradigm vs. the small testicles patrifocal gorilla harem paradigm.) If larger testicles and increased sperm production are associated with low-testosterone, promiscuous social-structure males, then the two variables will be related in the sense that higher-testosterone males will have smaller testicles or lower sperm production.

3) Autistic males will exhibit more neotenous characteristics, while autistic females should show less neoteny than their contemporaries.

4) The children of parents of widely different ethnicities, separated by tens of thousands of years from common ancestry, will reveal characteristics of their last common progenitor and increased incidence of autism and left-handedness. (Maturational delay progenitor feature emergences will be far more common in matrifocal social structure families.)

5) Neoteny has dental correlations, with smaller teeth being characteristic of the neotenous smaller jaw. Learning that teeth have grown smaller over millions of years, researchers will find that they have actually grown larger in males over the last few tens of thousands of years as patrifocal social structure has taken hold. Ontologically, the teeth of males from older mothers should be smaller than the teeth of males of first-born, young mothers. The reverse should be true for females. In a large family, the male’s teeth will erupt later and later, the female’s earlier and earlier.

6) Because a mother’s testosterone level rises with her age and because she has children across the whole arc of her reproductive years, we might observe a display of personality and physiological features in her children that would roughly reproduce human evolution over a span of eons. An older mother should more frequently have male children with maturational delay, female children with accelerated maturation and increased prevalence of autism in both sexes. Autistic children born to young mothers will more likely come with less frequency from families of left-handers, trauma being a likely cause.

7) Obese mothers (overweight women exhibit increased testosterone and estrogen levels), particularly those who are older, should show high incidence of autism in their children, particularly in migrating populations moving from equatorial regions to northern climates. Equatorial peoples transplanted to northern climates will display higher percentages of maturational-delayed male children, and maturational-accelerated females, including autistics, with the births congregating in certain seasons.

8) If the low-testosterone males and high-testosterone females are late born, and high-testosterone males and low-testosterone females are the oldest children in a family or the first born, then first-borns will mate with first-borns and late-borns will mate with late-borns a higher percentage of the time than would occur by chance.

9) Hypothesizing that social structure has political correlates, it would be likely that in a politically conservative family, if liberals were to emerge, it would be among the youngest sons and daughters. One would also expect a higher incidence of divorce or serial monogamy with youngest children (reflecting matrifocal values).

10) Conditions that display maturational delay, such as autism, Asperger’s and stuttering, will appear more often in males with longer limbs and smaller teeth than in others in their family of origin. This would suggest that the youngest males would also be the tallest. (Longer limbs and smaller teeth are neotenous features.)

11) Eating healthfully (the caveman diet) brings puberty later and provides a longer time for the brain to grow. Putting autistic children on such a late-puberty-enhancing diet may enhance their ability to connect. When puberty or progenesis in humans is dropped to a younger age by several years, it has neurological and cognitive repercussions. In addition to a possible increase in depression and bi-polar disorder, there is the potential for a general curtailment of the final stages of cognitive development.

12) Societal periods of innovation will be preceded by periods of romance, revealing changes in the selection criteria by which females pick their mates or by a widening of the selection criteria for the ideal male. Shifts toward increases in the variety of acceptable features in the procreation population will result in increases in cultural and technical variation. For example, if female infanticide is a tool used for patrifocal cultural stability, decreases in female infanticide over time within a culture will correlate with increases in societal and economic variation. These changes will result in matrifocal societal surges, increases in left-handedness and increases in autism.

13) If rhythm and dance were the aesthetics driving human evolution through rituals of sexual selection, then the sound and feeling of nonstop rhythm may be necessary to encourage the development of an autistic child. Rhythmic environmental triggers may be essential to the healthy growth of maturational-delayed children. By implication, comparing congenitally deaf left and right-handers may reveal an unusually high number of autistics in the left-handed group.

I am hypothesizing that evolution is driven by this hormonal ebbing and flowing, or waxing and waning. Mother’s testosterone levels > progeny maturation rate > social structure proclivity > evolutionary trajectory. Mother’s estrogen levels > progeny ability to exercise aesthetic discrimination and caring behavior > social structure proclivity > evolutionary trajectory. These two currents are inextricably intertwined, yet they follow established patterns, not unlike the double helix. Changes in hormone levels, influenced by the environment, impact ontogeny while we are in the womb, when we are children and after we’ve become grown-ups.

I call this the Theory of Waves to suggest the surge of features that travel ontogenetically back and forth from conception to adulthood and adulthood to conception over generations, with the direction of features often opposite between the sexes. Darwin proposed three different theories of evolution. This model in some ways integrates his three models (natural selection, sexual selection and Lamarckian selection, or pangenesis) and seeks to show patterns common to evolutionary biology (heterochronic theory), anthropology (social structure) and neuropsychology (sexual hormone endocrinology and Annett’s balanced polymorphism), all three of which describe ways that human beings may have evolved and may still be evolving.

Clearly, an adjustment (Matsuda, 1987) of Watson and Crick’s (1953) Central Dogma is occurring in several places in this thesis. Let me urge the reader to approach this work playfully while still rummaging for something useful in these conjectures. Most of all, perhaps, this thesis is suggesting that neoteny is central to being human. I believe that by playing with evolution we may discover who we are.

References:

Annett, M. (1985). Left, right, hand and brain: The Right Shift Theory. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Annett, M., Eglinton, E. & Smythe, P. (1996). Types of dyslexia and the shift to dextrality. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 37(2), 167-80.

Annett, M. (2002). Handedness and brain asymmetry. New York: Taylor & Francis Inc.

Ahluwalia, B. S., Clark, J. F., Westney, L. S., Smith, D. M., James, M. & Rajguru, S. (1992) Amniotic fluid and umbilical artery levels of sex hormones and prostaglandins in human cocaine users. Reproductive Toxicology, 6(1), 57-62.

Ahluwalia, B., Jackson, M. A., Jones ,G. W., Williams, A. O., Mamidanna, S. R. & Rajguru, S. (1981). Blood hormone profiles in prostate cancer patients in high-risk and low-risk populations. Cancer, 48(10), 2267-73.

Baron-Cohen, S., Lutchmaya, S. & Knickmeyer, R. (2004). Prenatal testosterone in mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Barrett-Connor, E. & Khaw, K. T. (1987) Cigarette smoking and increased endogenous estrogen levels in men. American Journal of Epidemiology, 126(2), 187-92.

Brenton, J. N., Devries, S. P., Barton, C., Minnich, H. & Sokol, D. K. (2008). Absolute pitch in a four-year-old boy with autism. Pediatric Neurology, 39(2), 137-8.

Castilla-Garcia, A., Santolaria-Fernandez, F. J., Gonzalez-Reimers, C. E., Bastita-Lopez, N., Gonzalez-Garcia, C., Jorge-Hernandez, J. A. & Hernandez-Nieto, L. (1987). Alcohol-induced hypogonadism: Reversal after ethanol withdrawal. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 20(3), 255-60.

Coger, R. W. & Serafetinides, E. A. (1990). Schizophrenia, corpus callosum, and interhemispheric communication: A review. Psychiatry Research, 34(2), 163-84.

Crow, T. J. (1995). A Darwinian approach to the origins of psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 167(1), 12-25.

Crow, T. J., Done, D. J. & Sacker, A. (1996). Cerebral lateralization is delayed in children who later develop schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 22(3), 181-5.

Diamond, J. M. (1986). Variation in human testis size. Nature, 320(6062), 488-9.

Eisler, R. (2007) The Real Wealth of Nations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler

Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Geschwind, N. & Galaburda, A. M. (1987). Cerebral Lateralization. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Gimbutas, M. (1991) The Civilization of the Goddess. San Francisco: Harper Collins

Glass, A. R., Swerdloff, R. S., Bray, G. A., Dahms, W. T. & Atkinson, R. L. (1977). Low serum testosterone and sex-hormone-binding globulin in massively obese men. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 45(6), 1211-19.

Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

Hjiej, H., Doyen, C., Couprie, C., Kaye, K. & Contejean, Y. (2008). Substitutive and dietetic approaches in childhood autistic disorder: Interests and limits [French]. L’Encephale, 34(5), 496-503.

James, W. H. (1986). Hormonal control of the sex ratio. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 118(4), 427-41.

Hall, B., Pearson, R. & Muller, G. (Eds.) (2004). Environment, Development, and Evolution. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Kuzawa, C. W. (2008). The developmental origins of adult health: Intergenerational inertia in adaptation and disease. In W. Trevathan, E. O. Smith & J. J. McKenna (Eds). Evolution and Health (325-49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Knight, C. (1991) Blood Relations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

MacConnie, S. E., Barkan, A., Lampman, R. M., Schork, M. A. & Beitins, I. Z. (1986). Decreased hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in male marathon runners. The New England Journal of Medicine, 315(7), 411-7.

MacMahon, B., Trichopoulos, D., Cole, P. & Brown, J. (1982). Cigarette smoking and urinary estrogens. New England Journal of Medicine, 307, 1062-5.

Matsuda, R. (1987). Animal Evolution in Changing Environments, With Special Reference to Abnormal Metamorphosis. New York: Wiley Press.

Miller, G. (2000). The Mating Mind. New York: Random House.

Morville, R., Pesquies, P. C., Guezennec, C. Y., Serrurier, B. D. & Guignard, M. (1979). Plasma variations in testicular and adrenal androgens during prolonged physical exercise in man. Annales d’Endocrinlogie (Paris), 40(5), 501-10.

Ross, R., Bernstein, L., Judd, H., Hanisch, R., Pike, M., & Henderson, B. E. (1986). Serum testosterone levels in healthy young black and white men. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 76(1), 45-8.

Schmidt, T., Wijga, A., Von Zur Muhlen, A., Brabant, G. & Wagner, T. O. F. (1997). Changes in cardiovascular risk factors and hormones during a comprehensive residential three month kriya yoga training and vetetarian nutrition. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica Supplement, 640, 158-62.

Watson, J. D. & Crick, F. (1953). Molecular structure of nucleic acids: A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 171, 737-8.

Wiercinski, A. (1979). Has the brain size decreased since the upper paleolithic. Bulletins et Memoirs de la Societe d’Anthropologie de Paris, 6(6-4), 419-27.

Witelson, S. F. (1991). Neural sexual mosaicism: Sexual differentiation of the human temporo-parietal region for functional asymmetry. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 16(1-3), 131-53

The introduction to this piece was modified on 3/8/09

For more details regarding this theory, visit http://www.neoteny.org/?cat=28

For more details regarding this theory and autism, visit http://www.neoteny.org/?cat=29


Comments

This entry was posted on Friday, February 6th, 2009 at 8:04 am and is filed under 10-Autism, 10-Most Commented, 10-Most Visited, Autism, Autism & Society, Autism Features, Biology, Causes of Autism, Environmental Effects, Estrogen, Female Infanticide, lefthanded, Maturation Rates, Neoteny, Ontogeny, predictions, Sexual Selection, Sexual Selection/Social Structure, Social, Social Structure, Society, Testosterone & Estrogen, Theory, Theory Predictions. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
43 Comments so far

  1. didier on February 6, 2009 8:09 am

    We are living in an unprecedented social experiment.

    Never so much technology has been available to everyone.
    From a very young age, children start with a computer connected to the Internet then graduate very quickly in the name of parent security with mobile phones, they are the new generation of connected kids.
    For these kids social interactivity is happening through emails, SMS and of course what it is called “Social” sites with the likes of Facebook and others.

  2. Rob Harvey on February 10, 2009 9:41 pm

    Hi:

    I received an email notifying me that updated material had been posted. I have browsed through this posting and have much the same objections I have pointed out before.

    Specifically and additionally:

    1) Science should not be conducted with bias. You’re presentation reeks with bias.

    2) You will not recognize the important role of cognition and memory in human interactions, and instead try to explain humans as being about as simple as multi-celled microbes. This was a popular fashion in some halls of science in the 1970’s and 80’s, but fell out of fashion because of advancements in neuroscience and cognitive theories, which revealed humans to be far more mentally complex – both rational and irrational – than had been thought by post 1950’s and pre 1990’s science.

    3) Your biases, which cause you to favor the now-out-of-fashion overly-materialistic scientific world-view that reigned from the 1950’s to the 1990’s, also cause you to not consider the effects of consciousness on human development. Have you read the Upanishads? Were the Brahmin controlled soley by their hormones, or could they “see” how to improve their lot and ride herd on the rest? How did they figure that out? I understand you will see this as a later “patri-focal” society, but what led to that? The process of cognition and memory taking some precedence of control over simpler hormonal/bio-chemical animal behaviors likely was gradual in development and may have developed extremely slowly at first, dependant not on hormones but on word of mouth and writing.

    Also, your theory is so “grand” that it is ultimately unprovable because it would require too much data collection from past eras, and so really you should abandon it as it is unprovable.

    While it may be that big headed dancing males (gigalos/boy-toys?) were the typical father in ancient human tribes, which is what we see with many monkeys, apes, chimps, etc., that claim does not seem unusual, if humans descended from apes. You introduce bias when you call the impregnation of a female by a big-headed ape-man “sexual selection”. Likely there was no selection taking place, rather, the whole thing was a bit random, and what we today call “rape” was likely common, and even the smaller headed ones who could not dance well often “got some pussy”.

    And if threatening conditons favored smaller headed males who could not dance, but who had better cognitions/memory or better physical strength, thus more testosterone, it is a bias to put the testosterone before the strength or cognitions/memory – like putting the chicken before the egg. Niether came first.

    I think it is already assumed and has been for over a hundred years that evolutionary forces tend to harden individuals and species. That is how it has to be if any species is to become somewhat stable and not disappear. This is actually a good thing, and why you exist today.

    Also, you use the word “cooperative” in a similarly biased way as you use “sexual selection”. Gigalos and boy-toys are “cooperative”? You use that word as if it describes something that can’t be deconstucted. Why don’t you spend some time deconstructing what you mean by that word? Hmmm? That is a very value-laden and “fill in the blank”-centric word.

    And you seem to set as opposites, “cooperation” and the more aggressive behavior of higher testosterone, less aesthetic males. Could it be that the more aggressive men, the stronger men, were actually the more cooperative ones, at least with regards their tribe’s cause and continued existence? Might not the gigalos and boy-toys have run off into the forest like scared bunnies when threatening men from other tribes came looking for booty?

    And what about those women who think a high-testoterone male is attractive and preferable, not in a soley aesthetic way, but because they also understand cognitively that they may be better off with him – a man with a jaw cut like that of Julius Ceasar? And what if such a woman had a daliance with a neonate boy toy who looked like Brad Pitt, but still prefered to be the wife of a Julius Ceasar look alike, and have that man father her children? How would your hormone theory explain her? Certainly she is attracted to Brad Pitt, with his big head and baby face, ( that attraction could be hormones) but preferred his opposite as father of her children! This kind of thing does happen – just follow the Hollywood tabloids if you don’t believe me.

    Anyway, I must ask to be removed from the mailing list. You are too biased to do science – proper science has no agenda, no preconceptions, no morality and no ethics, and thus no goal. Science does not require happy endings, nor even the possibility of one, but of course that possibility may exist.

    Also, you might want to try to get a better understanding of what “random” means. Basically, it means “non-interpretable”. There is a random noise floor behind all the sciences, and it is overlooked since it can’t be explained. Engineering takes the noise floor into account and works out ways that products can be made even with noise in the background – imprecision.

    Cheers

  3. Andrew on February 11, 2009 7:28 am

    I don’t deny I carry bias. My presuppositions are noted in this piece and outlined in great detail throughout this website. This piece was written because I believe the outcome of my presuppositions, my biases, have the potential to be useful.

    It is whether this theory is useful or not that is most important.

    Note the various predictions that this theory suggests here http://www.neoteny.org/?cat=23.

  4. Tinker Toying with Celebrities : Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism - how they all connect on February 16, 2009 7:58 am

    […] For a detailed introduction to the model behinds this concept, click here. […]

  5. Christopher Rushlau on February 21, 2009 9:56 pm

    Heh, heh.
    Could you put your thesis in one sentence, please? I spent fifteen minutes studying this and every passing minute took me further from any discernible point.
    So now I’m totally clueless as to what’s on your mind.
    I hope that isn’t your intent. It seems to be, however. Connect that with your various claims of authority, including the imperial MoveOn.org, makes you appear demagogical. That’s something I was accused of, once, and I think it was because I was convinced I’d never get anybody to listen if I stuck to what I knew. Maybe, in turn, that was because I hadn’t studied anything much.
    This is not to say inspiration and spontaneity are not paramount. They are. But to get your insights across, you have to be, as the cliche went a few years ago, culturally literate.
    This essay or whatever it is is not speaking any language I recognize. It doesn’t create any pictures in my mind, except that of someone, to quote a lawyer on lawyers, “throwing mud in my eye”.

  6. Christopher Rushlau on February 21, 2009 10:05 pm

    I say “heh, heh” because I made up a website name for myself, so I would look more important, and of course I picked “http://iamyourgod.com”. It looks even more impressive with the “http://” in front of it. In the context, that means more ridiculous. Hence, “heh, heh”.
    As Fr. Brickl said to me, citing his own “wild” boyhood on a farm in Wisconsin, it’s “sobriety” we need. That’s not just the absence of intoxicants–of all sorts, including political–but the presence of mind to be calm and accessible to what is happening. Which is a philosophical position, an ethical one, even a religious one. When I was studying economics and urban studies at one college, I said to the biology major and the physics major at the other end of the off-campus house, “Science assumes that the unknown is good.”
    “Rage, rage against the dying of the night–do not go gentle into that dark night”? I say, “let yourself experience the limits of your experience–you will encounter all kinds of wonderful things”.
    Firstly, that you know almost nothing. Which is a huge relief.

  7. barrie on February 23, 2009 1:34 pm

    1) natural selection
    2) sexual selection (selecting for pattern when seeking a mate)
    3) human sexual selection (selection for novel pattern when seeking a mate)
    4) art and culture (selecting for novel pattern outside of mate selection)
    5) awareness of the selection or creative process
    6) intrusion of perverse (PC) thinking
    7) application of medical bias – perhaps in conjunction with 6?

  8. Dan Guinan on February 23, 2009 4:33 pm

    I agree with all of the above but do see the value of this conjectural thinking. I can not grasp the full scope of this theorizing here without spending more time doing an outline or seperating conjecture from fact. However, it may me ask the question…Is there a link between a subtly perceived ‘gay physiognomy’ (a neotenic physiognomy?) and hormones (either during gestation or inherited)? There also seems some fruitful ground for investigation in a link between autism and sexual orientation.

    This week I learned that to be balanced I need to not overindulge in the physical (food, sleep), mental (thinking, reading), emotional (social avoidance, anxiety) or spiritual (nature connection, daydreaming). So although I would like to analyze and understand your article and help you express it more clearly I will leave it for now.

  9. Andrew on February 26, 2009 9:55 am

    There are several studies regarding homosexuality, autism, left handedness, and maturational delays. Visit http://www.neoteny.org/neoteny/a/homosexuality.html.

    Visit sexualselection.org for a host of excepts in the databases section of the right side.

  10. A on February 27, 2009 11:10 am

    I’m still not getting it. What is the evolutionary benefit of being neurotypical? I’m looking at this http://www.grandin.com/inc/mind.web.browser.html and she is talking about how non-autistic people’s brains can do things that autistic brains can’t. She says normal people have a higher consciousness, and that autistics are more like animals. I would like to know what it is like to be neurotypical. I feel that I am not fully human.

  11. Andrew on February 28, 2009 9:02 am

    Marian Annett’s work details the “balanced polymorphism” that makes the neurotypical life an easier life to lead, a life likely to serve society in a conventional fashion.

    A number of the world’s foremost innovators, Einstein, Darwin, Newton, are believed by some to be Aspergers. It’s not a question of being “fully human” which might just mean extremely split (as in split brained right hander). It’s the fact that there is an alternative thread of humans, less cerebrally differentiated, perhaps less “awake” as in self referential, but perhaps more awake as to the nature of the self.

  12. Christopher Rushlau on February 28, 2009 9:39 am

    Candor–clarity–candlepower–at last. The “fact” of a separete strain of humans is not shown; and the claim underlies totalitarianism–the supposed power of some to define others.
    “The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bi-Cameral Mind” seems to be your Ur-text. My childhood friend met this author in a bar in Princeton and described him to me as “squirrely”. The book begins by demolishing the notion of consciousness, but then disappears into the mists of far-flung and, when I left the expedition, never-gathered jargon.
    Some research into homosexuality described a widened corpus callosum in those identifed (by whom?) as homosexual. This is the bundle of nerve fiber linking the two hemispheres.
    I have a continuing experience, first noticed when I was twenty, of being in bed, in the dark, my eyes closed, and I’ll suddenly feel like there are two “me’s”, two imaginations (mind’s eyes), functioning. More recently I’ve determined that I can induce this state if I am too sloppy in my imaginative life–as by squaring the mythical circle–being preposterous–“back to front”–or morely frankly self-contradictory.
    That is a minor and ephemeral neurological phenomenon.
    Distinctions in achievement are more readily ascribed (Occam’s economizing) to honesty and dilligence.
    A broadened corpus callosum might facilitate handier social camouflage.
    But liars always give themselves away.
    Have you given any thought to the location and neurological characteristics of the imagination?
    I adopt the theory of Aristotle, Aquinas, and Rahner, which accords with my experience, that the imagination is the locus of knowledge in the act of conversio ad phantasma, the recombination of the abstracted essence, the definition, of a thing with the sensory impression of that thing. Where else but the imagination if this is knowledge? If it is, it is ephemeral and non-self-verifying. There is no consciousness, which implies simultaneous explicit knowledge and instant verification.
    My handy rule of thumb is that I cannot do what I am doing and know what I am doing at the same instant.
    Getting used to this may be the “door to perception” and the avenue to achievement.
    What do they call that on the playground? It’s called “not being “self-conscious”.

  13. A on February 28, 2009 11:58 am

    Wait, are you saying that neurotypicals are more domesticated? Like sheep are the domesticated version of goats? Like pigs are domesticated boar?

  14. Andrew on March 1, 2009 8:38 pm

    Domestication, in this context, I think means easily adjusted to conventions. The conventions are different in matri vs. patri societies.

    Regarding imagination, I don’t know where to begin. Visit http://www.neoteny.org/?cat=31 for some of my thoughts on the subject.

  15. Chris Rushlau on March 1, 2009 11:20 pm

    Why is there something instead of nothing? Either the unknown is lurking to deceive you or it is providing everything you need to allow you to essayons. That is the motto of the Army engineers, but, suitably, it means “let us try”, not “let me try”.
    The two problems of modern philosophy are whether there is something rather than nothing, and what “we” means.
    My answers are that there is only one question there, so only one answer to seek.
    The answer is to seek peacefully.

  16. Christopher Rushlau on March 4, 2009 9:18 am

    The greatest challenge facing science today is to map the imagination.
    I don’t think–having looked at the page of your thoughts about pre-un-hyper-non-sub-consciousness (and assuming that those blurbs aptly represent–like abstracts in science publications–the arguments each introduces)–anybody will be able to talk me out of the doctrine of Aristotle-Aquinas-Rahner that knowledge occurs in the imagination when the definition rejoins the sensory impression. This is how it seems. Knowledge is ephemeral (“for a day”). When you stop thinking about something, you stop knowing it. Dewey or James or somebody tried to shift the focus to skills–stuff we know how to do–but this is a sidetrack into an easy and irrelevant diversion (redundancy there). (I could have said “easy and irrelevant sidetrack”–my point being that rhetoric is as germane to science as it is to politics or art–how you say something determines what you manage to get said.)
    The political significance of imagination being the seat of (ephemeral) knowledge is that all of our political ideas, such as the situation of autistic or homosexual or biologically superior people, are arguments that we’ve been exposed to, and nothing more. Surely no basis for coercion.
    How then do we come to coerce? There is a right way and a wrong–if, despite all attempts to think more clearly and think less altogether and think bigger, we still end up coercing someone, it might turn out we acted properly. On the other hand, if we met the crisis, acted, and walked away with one idea fixed in our brows, it might turn out we acted properly. “How would it turn out one way or the other?”
    We are always catching ourselves acting without thinking. For that matter, we sometimes catch ourselves thinking without thinking, as when we speak impulsively–surprising ourselves–and turn out (?) to have thought or said just the right thing. If there is no intuitive behavior, there is no escape from, what, Wittgenstein’s “cage of language” (?), a cul de sac of rationalizations.
    The practical import of this view of the lack of consciousness ever is that, in a crisis, we tend to generate more ideas, and thus face more distractions from intuitively “hitting the mark”. So you can describe a human discipline of emptying thoughts so as to, firstly, hear yourself think, and then, act without thinking. Let yourself act in the moment.
    Performance artists can talk to this point. Any artist knows. I saw a painter speak on TV about finding herself half way across a busy city street in the midst of traffic. That’s what it’s like to paint. How do you get off the street without getting run over? You have to go back into that trance or whatever it was that got you half way across the street. Blind panic? Maybe, but it was some idea that let you move without checking the map. Maps are always wrong.
    There is no consciousness.
    There is this, and us.
    If we could demonstrate how imagination is a brain activity as much as it is the experience of, perhaps, being awake, or, perhaps, being lost in a day dream (or, alternatively, the absence of brain activity when asleep, perhaps when sleep-walking as opposed to walking when awake), we could encourage the public belief that knowledge is ephemeral. You could neatly define totalitarianism as the belief that knowledge (in the hands of the fateful few) is more real and concrete than constitutions, cameras, public opinion, or any other liberal trapping or prop. Gnosticism is usually derided by orthodox theologians as a mystery cult that thought it had esoteric knowledge of the nature of God.
    If imagination turns up in brain studies to be the location (or event!) of ephemeral knowledge, we would go to a world, a culture, where we would be comfortable with “well, what do you know for sure?”, “oh, not much”. We could be comfortable with each other as fellow-non-knowers.
    Then we might accumulate a few more useful skills. And shed some of the less useful ones.
    Science and poetry are not knowledge and they are not skills. They are being surprised by grace, however you want to define that last term.
    If every deep conviction was monitored by brain scanners which revealed that the same pattern of brain activity accompanied the direst malevolent delusions–some global or oceanic experience–we would endorse the sentiment of Samuel Sewell, the only Salem witch-burning judge to repent, who learned to judge his epiphanies not by their “earnestness” but by their “regularity”. Which is to say, to submit them to the impartial opinions of a candid world.
    Totalitarians seal their fate by refusing to talk with those who are not of their number.
    So the poet, the scientist, the politician, has one rule. Never run away from a conversation. Never be afraid of hearing something.
    I am currently embarked in the struggle to translate my epiphany from law school, that lies never persuade, into a skill at translating people’s lies into what they intend, what they mean or feel. I am into the idea that lies contain contradictions, and on the edge of the idea that contradictions contain unities.
    An example. Your opening paragraphs and a comment added show you believe some people are biologically superior to others. The entire thrust of your website seems to be to insist on that view and to place yourself in the higher grade.
    That contradicts the rule of research of not assuming the truth of the thing you’re trying to prove, which is also probably a rule of rhetoric. But your insistence is intriguing. All this use of “-consciousness” terms suggests you think the wrong-doers, the bad, inferior people are not so much biologically imperfect as philosophically imperfect (even while trying to prove that philosophy is all biological: another, or the same, self-contradiction–how would you escape such determinism to identify it?). So you are seeking a politics by which to organize and negotiate with crazy people so as to convince them and then to work with them to convince others not to hate odd people.
    So you set up this other category of odd people, who cannot help their oddness, in distinction from the target population of bad people, who are more culpable for their badness, their bigotry, their “set-in-their-way-ness”.
    This is the fundamental lie in this material you set out. You are not determined, some people are, and other people should treat the first group generously. But how are you not determined, and the latter group, too?
    So what truth does this lie speak?
    If we are all together, with nary a clue among us, is there human evil, and if there is, how do we stop it without some benchmark of righteousness?
    Totalitarians always justify their work in the short run as a response to an emergency
    Being careful always to not let jargon impedge the conversation, all we can do is consult as widely as possible. That is what every cabal, every junta, does anyway. Our test would be if we can consult more widely than they.
    What is the role in consultation of evidence? The more we make our conversations concrete, by the use of evidence, the more we trust that we are indeed in a conversation, and the more we come to rely on each other thereby.
    It is one thing to “wink out” in nirvana. It is another to have a fellow out-winker at one’s side.

  17. Sadi Synn on March 22, 2009 11:27 pm

    A significant part of human diversity, for sure. Neither the be-all or extinctable (old Injun word I just made up), just a branch. I belong to and am befriended by many “throw-backs” with ancient instincts intact, un hampered by domestication. Yet we are able to take up computer study in our 50’s, as well as new careers like an arborist or IT management.

    I’ll stick to my rugged individualist life-style. Saving the available grants and entitlements for “mortals”.

    Cheers!
    “Hope you guessed my name.”

  18. Researching Slippery Subjects : Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism - how they all connect on March 26, 2009 9:55 am

    […] Thesis Summary […]

  19. Do Nonmigrant Northern Latitude Populations Exhibit Increased Biological and Societal Neoteny? : Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism - how they all connect on March 27, 2009 10:04 am

    […] Thesis Summary […]

  20. Prem on May 6, 2009 1:44 pm

    Nice thoughts and potentially groundbreaking,
    Someone like you is needed to think out of the box. I must confess that I am no great hand in evolutionary biology but I too do see some of the elements of evolutionary short circuiting in humans due to cultural driving forces which blur out the sexual selection as in a classical darwinian sense.

    But in spite of the drawbacks, it is indeed out of experience and research hands down accepted that the hormones control our lives in ways we could not even acknowledge without severely compromising on our egos. For example in hormonally induced depression a perefectly reasonable person is likely to do absurd things, otherwise unexplicable even in a highly educated and cultured background unless that one acknowledges that these dam’n chemicals make us miserable or boost us in ways beyond our control.

    So taking these factors the theory would definitely light the lantern for a cross disciplinary solution oriented approach . I would prefer it to be accomodative to socio-cultural factors too, instead of it explaining most of the social outcomes somewhat simplistically attributing to hormonal rages.

    A great beginning, Sir, and best wishes.

  21. Ouroboros, Autism and Future Past : Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism - how they all connect on May 18, 2009 7:20 am

    […] Thesis Summary […]

  22. Seeking the Simplicity : Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism - how they all connect on May 23, 2009 6:57 am

    […] Thesis Summary […]

  23. Neoteny and the Elites : Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism - how they all connect on June 2, 2009 7:29 am

    […] other pieces on this website (click here), I’ve discussed the hypothetical influence of diet on human social evolution and how social […]

  24. Estrogen, Puberty and Autism : Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism - how they all connect on June 3, 2009 7:11 am

    […] the thesis outlined in detail in the “Introduction to the Theory of Waves,” we can see that a mother with high testosterone (T) births sons with low testosterone (t) […]

  25. Female Choice and Maternal Behavior : Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism - how they all connect on June 9, 2009 7:23 am

    […] THESIS SUMMARY […]

  26. Estrogen as a Governor of Evolution : Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism - how they all connect on June 10, 2009 6:48 am

    […] THESIS SUMMARY […]

  27. Estrogen and Evolution : Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism - how they all connect on June 11, 2009 7:01 am

    […] THESIS SUMMARY […]

  28. Email to a recent (3/28) visitor : Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism - how they all connect on June 25, 2009 7:32 am

    […] THESIS SUMMARY […]

  29. Bernard Crespi inspired exploration of autism and schizophrenia etiology based on lateralization and corpous callosum variation. : Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism - on July 17, 2009 7:30 am

    […] THESIS SUMMARY […]

  30. Creoles, Hybrid Vigor, Aboriginal Identity and Autism : Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism - how they all connect on August 7, 2009 7:10 am

    […] THESIS SUMMARY […]

  31. Shawn on August 29, 2009 5:56 pm

    some intriguing hypotheses there, Andrew! I don’t have much to say yet– no time to really read deeply– but I was tickled by your constellations of male and female types, and your idea of “naturally occurring complimentary counterparts.”

    See– speaking for myself, as a (probably by your theory) high-T-high-E female, the last thing I want around me would be a low-T-low-E male– or female. I could only pair up well with a TE man– or woman. That’s not because of evolutionary imperatives it’s because of my own intellectual, interpersonal, and personal satisfaction needs. Cognitive stuff.

    Let’s remember that a great deal of our environment, as humans is cultural. And we create culture– we create our own environment, which we then respond to, in presumably Darwinian ways– which then responds to us.

    More, I hope, later.

  32. Berthajane Vandegrift on September 20, 2009 4:48 pm

    I’m sure hormones, which are influenced by emotions, play a role in the complex organization we call life. I’m sure science will learn some of the details of how hormones interact. However I’m confident such discoveries will not reveal a mechanical, deterministic process that can be described by mathematical formulas. The difference between life and non life is that life responds rationally and purposefully to stimuli, and it sometimes surprises us with unpredictable creativity.

    You speak of selection – natural selection, sexual selection and even artificial selection. I’m sure they all play a role in evolution and living systems, but they do not create anything. I have become so disgusted with the way materialists have tried to impose the “random mutation and natural selection” formula upon us an explanation for biological creativity, that I have an averse reaction to the mere mention of any kind of biological “selection“. I can think of only three explanations for the ORIGIN of biological novelty –(1) accident, (2) the result of mechanical, deterministic processes, or (3) the result of intelligent, purposeful organization. I believe life is to some extent constrained by its past, but still has some ability to change responsively. Life designs itself, in purposeful response to the needs of the organism. Accidents result in defects. I do not see the organizing intelligence of life as supernatural — any more than I view the ability of my body to unconsciously respond to daily changes in the environment as supernatural. Furthermore such responses appear too variable to be regarded as automatic.

    The study of hormones will reveal valuable information, depending upon whether the context in which they are studied is valid. Both the accidental and the view of life as a mechanical, deterministic process will not lead anywhere, IMHO.

  33. Paul Benavidez on October 5, 2009 9:04 pm

    I would like to ask questions of the author regarding this article.

    I am an MFA student researching a visual culture paper about autism and art.

    Please contact me at your earliest convenience.

  34. Integrating Estrogen and Testosterone | Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism - how they all connect on October 16, 2009 7:05 am

    […] THESIS SUMMARY […]

  35. Neuropsychology and Autism | Neurodiversity on December 14, 2009 8:43 am

    […] is the insight that humans evolved primarily do to sexual selection, not natural selection.  Click here for details.  Click here for citation […]

  36. A relationship between autism and aboriginal society. | Neurodiversity on January 14, 2010 9:06 am

    […] position taken in the more detailed piece, “Introduction to the Theory of Waves,” is that aboriginal matrifocal societies will exhibit populations with larger percentages of […]

  37. Estrogen, Puberty and Autism | Neurodiversity on January 18, 2010 8:13 am

    […] the thesis outlined in detail in the “Introduction,” we can see that a mother with high testosterone (T) births sons with low testosterone (t) and […]

  38. porn on March 21, 2012 12:02 am

    porn…

    […]Introduction to the Theory of Waves | Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism – how they all connect[…]…

  39. Find the fastest way to get a six pack on April 26, 2012 1:28 am

    Find the fastest way to get a six pack…

    […]Introduction to the Theory of Waves | Neoteny, sexual selection, cause of autism, human evolution, social transformation, left organizing and internet activism – how they all connect[…]…

  40. Genes y memes matri y patrifocales (I) | neurociencia neurocultura on July 13, 2015 12:25 pm

    […] ha de integrarse en una sociedad. Una sociedad que además reproduce -según Lehman describe en este interesante articulo- las vicisitudes de los individuos. Pues todo individuo a través de su maduración ontológica ha […]

  41. personal dog trainer london ontario on June 15, 2016 6:54 am

    Tipped jobs are an excellent part-time opportunity if you know which offer the best pay.

  42. canadian pharmacy on April 19, 2017 12:04 pm

    Global Low-down Far this outcome

  43. canadian pharmacy on May 22, 2018 4:41 am

    Global Low-down Here this product

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Share your wisdom