April 9, 2009 | Leave a Comment
Imagine that ten years from now autism and Asperger’s are still on the rise. It is discovered that aboriginal matrifocal societies often exhibit what Gregory Bateson described as primary process.
“Primary process is characterized (e.g., by Fenichel) as lacking negatives, lacking tense, lacking in any identification of linguistic mood (i.e., no identification of indicative, subjunctive, optative, etc.) and metaphoric. These characterizations are based upon the experience of psychoanalysts, who must interpret dreams and the patterns of free associations.” (Bateson G (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Balantine: New York, p. 139)
In other words, some ancient matrilineal societies may exhibit a less robust “theory of mind” than moderns. Connections between matrifocal aboriginals and modern autistics are made.
The recapitulationists of the early twentieth century that emphasized three-fold and four-fold parallelisms make a new kind of sense. In other words, there emerges a connection between the scales of human societal evolution and individual ontogeny insofar as aboriginal society child rearing practices inform how modern society can raise the children of its high testosterone women. (I hypothesize that the women in early matrifocal societies are high testosterone and high estrogen.)
Imagine that ten years from now these connections are being made. High testosterone mothers (and perhaps high testosterone, high estrogen mothers) are provided specific guidance on how to raise their children using aboriginal techniques. The web becomes filled with the various ways children are guided into adulthood within an environment suited to their unique bodies, minds and brains. Autism rates plummet but fully functional, socialized children with autistic (matrilineal aboriginal) bodies, minds and spirits are discovered to be making unique and profound contributions to society.
World culture drifts in the direction of raising children using aboriginal conventions.
The result two generations from now is a dramatic drop in commercial innovation and industrial production but a skyrocketing in aesthetics, programming and mathematics. Art and the abstract sciences burn up the planet’s online bandwidth with an amateurization of professions formerly available to the very few.
Our consumer economy is crashing. What will take its place? Consider this just-so story as one alternative direction.